Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Netlist, Inc. v. Micron Technology, Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00203 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 31, 2024)

Denied
Summary Judgment IPR / PTAB
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00203, Dkt. No. 480
Decided
January 31, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 426 Report and Recommendations. Court OVERRULES Netlists Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ORDERS that the Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding IPR Estoppel (Dkt. No. 275)…
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

NETLIST, INC., §

Plaintiff, § § v. § Case No. 2:22-cv-00203-JRG-RSP § MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. et al., § Defendants. §

ORDER

Netlist, Inc. (“Netlist”) previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding IPR Estoppel (Dkt. No. 275). Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 426), recommending denial of Netlist’s Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding IPR Estoppel. Netlist has now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 445).

After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motion for Summary Judgment, . the Report and Recommendation, and the briefing on Netlist’s Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES Netlist’s Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ORDERS that the Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding IPR Estoppel (Dkt. No. 275) is DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 31st day of January, 2024.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Netlist, Inc. v. Micron Technology, Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00203 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 31, 2024).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_22-cv-00203-12
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_22-cv-00203-12

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case