IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
§
STATON TECHIYA, LLC AND
§
SYNERGY IP CORPORATION,
§ §
Plaintiffs,
§
CIVIL ACTION No. 2:21-cv-00413-JRG-RSP §
v.
(Lead Case) § §
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,
§
LTD. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
§
AMERICA, INC.
§ §
Defendants.
ORDER
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of No Infringement of the ’982 Patent, Dkt. No. 436, a Motion for Summary Judgment of No Infringement of the ’259 Patent, Dkt. No. 442, a Motion for Summary Judgment of No Infringement of the ’400 Patent, Dkt. No. 443, and a Motion for Summary Judgment of Lack of Entitlement to Damages for Techiya, Dkt. No. 434. Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 718), recommending denial of Samsung’s motions. Samsung has now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 733).
After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on Samsung’s motions, the Report and Recommendation, and the briefing on Samsung’s Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES Samsung’s Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and orders that the Motion for Summary Judgment of No Infringement of the ’982 Patent, Dkt. No. 436, the Motion for Summary Judgment of No Infringement of the ’259 Patent, Dkt. No. 442, the Motion for Summary2 Judgment of No Infringement of the ’400 Patent, Dkt. No. 443, the Motion for Summary Judgment of Lack of Entitlement to Damages for Techiya, Dkt. No. 434, are DENIED.
So Ordered this Dec 4, 2023
