Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Staton Techiya, LLC et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:21-cv-00413 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 11, 2024)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00413, Dkt. No. 979
Decided
September 11, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Motion(s)977 terminated)
Length
2 pages

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

STATON TECHIYA, LLC, §

§ Plaintiff, § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:21-CV-00413-JRG v. § (LEAD CASE) § SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-00053-JRG SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, § (MEMBER CASE)

INC., §

§ Defendants. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Before the Court is the Unopposed Motion for Leave for Extension of Time and to Exceed Page Limit for its Reply in Support of its Motion for Attorneys’ and Other Fees (the “Motion”) filed by Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”). (Dkt. No. 977.) In the Motion, Defendants request a 14-day extension for Defendants to file their reply in support of their Motion for Attorneys’ and Other Fees (“Reply”). (Id. at 1.) The requested extension would move the deadline for Defendants to file their Reply from September 12, 2024, up to and including September 26, 2024. (Id.) In the Motion, Defendants also seek leave to exceed the page limit for their Reply. (Id. at 2.) The Local Rules limit Defendants’ Reply to five pages. Local Rule CV-7(a)(2). Defendants seek an additional 12 pages for their Reply for a total of 17 pages. (Dkt. No. 977 at 2.) The Motion is unopposed. (Id.)

Having considered the Motion, and noting that it is unopposed, the Court finds that it should be and hereby is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that the deadline for Defendants to file their Reply is extended up to and including September 23, 2024. The Court further ORDERS that Defendants have leave to exceed the page limit for their Reply.

2So Ordered this Sep 11, 2024
Figure on page 2 of the opinion

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Staton Techiya, LLC et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:21-cv-00413 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 11, 2024).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_21-cv-00413-13
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_21-cv-00413-13

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.