Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Alacritech Inc. v. CenturyLink, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-00693 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 22, 2017)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00693, Dkt. No. 363
Decided
September 22, 2017
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J. — Texarkana
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING 340 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and 44 Motion by CenturyLink is DENIED
Length
2 pages

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

ALACRITECH, INC., § §

Plaintiff, § § v. § No. 2:16-CV-00693-RWS-RSP

§ (LEAD CASE)

CENTURYLINK, INC., § §

Defendant. §

ORDER ADOPTING

The Court referred the above-entitled and numbered civil action to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Now before the Court is Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 340), which recommends the Court deny Tier 3, Inc.’s, Savvis Communications Corp.’s, and CenturyLink Communications, LLC’s (together, “CenturyLink”) Motion to Dismiss Alacritech’s Indirect Infringement Claims Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (Docket No. 44).

No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed within the prescribed objection period. The Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Alacritech has sufficiently pleaded facts that CenturyLink had knowledge of the Asserted Patents such that CenturyLink's motion to dismiss pre-suit indirect infringement claims should be denied. Alacritech has also sufficiently alleged that CenturyLink had specific intent to induce infringement, and that CenturyLink's technology has no substantial non-infringing uses.

Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 340) as the findings and conclusions of this Court. CenturyLink's Motion (Docket No. 44) is DENIED.

2.

SIGNED this 22nd day of September, 2017.

ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Alacritech Inc. v. CenturyLink, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-00693 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 22, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_16-cv-00693-4
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_16-cv-00693-4

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.