Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Alacritech Inc. v. CenturyLink, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-00693 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 13, 2023)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00693, Dkt. No. 892
Decided
October 13, 2023
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
)ORDER granting 846 Stipulation. Court ACCEPTS AND ACKNOWLEDGES that all claims and causes of action asserted between Alacritech and Cavium, including claims involving Cavium products against Wistron and Dell, in member cases 2:16-cv- 00692…
Length
2 pages

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

ALACRITECH INC., §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. §

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-00693-RWS-RSP §

(LEAD CASE)

CENTURYLINK, INC. et al, §

§

Defendants. §

§

ORDER

Before the Court is the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Alacritech Inc. and Intervenor Cavium, LLC. (Dkt. No. 846.) In the Stipulation, the parties represent that claims and counterclaims have been resolved between the indicated parties. (Id. at 1.) The parties request dismissal WITH prejudice of the claims and counterclaims between Alacritech and Cavium in member cases 2:16-cv-00692 and 2:16-cv-00695. (Id. at 1.)

Additionally, the parties represent that all claims brought by Alacritech against Wistron Corp., SMS Infocomm Corp, and Wiwynn Corp. (collectively, “Wistron”) for products that are or incorporate products from Cavium or its affiliates have been resolved, and request dismissal WITH prejudice for these claims in member case 2:16-cv-00692. (Id.)

Finally, the parties represent that all claims brought by Alacritech against Dell Inc. for products that are or incorporate products from Cavium or its Affiliates have been resolved and request dismissal WITH prejudice for these claims in member case 2:16-cv-00695. (Id. at 2.)

Having considered the Stipulation, the Court ACCEPTS AND ACKNOWLEDGES that all claims and causes of action asserted between Alacritech and Cavium, including claims2 involving Cavium products against Wistron and Dell, in member cases 2:16-cv-00692, 2:16-cv-00695 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Each party is to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees. In light of this Order, and the joint notice filed by the parties, Dkt. Nos. 609, 636, 637 & 639 are DENIED AS MOOT. All other pending requests for relief between Cavium, Alacritech, and Wistron in the above-captioned case not explicitly granted herein are DENIED AS MOOT.

The Clerk of Court is directed to MAINTAIN AS OPEN the above-captioned case and member cases 2:16-cv-00692, 2:16-cv-00695.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Alacritech Inc. v. CenturyLink, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-00693 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 13, 2023).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_16-cv-00693-16
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_16-cv-00693-16

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.