Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Navico, Inc. et al v. Garmin International, Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00190 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 31, 2017)

Adopted in Part Report and recommendation adopted with modification
Summary Judgment Invalidity (§ 102/§ 103)
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00190, Dkt. No. 211
Decided
August 31, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 195 Report and Recommendation. (Navicos Motion (Dkt. No. 103) is GRANTED IN PART. Specifically, Navicos Motion is GRANTED with respect to the Kongsberg MS1000 System and claims 48, 49, 61, and 62…
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

NAVICO INC. and NAVICO § HOLDING AS, §

§ Plaintiffs, § § v. § NO. 2:16-CV-00190-JRG-RSP § GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. and § GARMIN USA, INC., §

§ Defendants. §

ORDER

The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 195) by Magistrate Judge Payne, which recommends that Navico’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment That No Asserted Claims Are Anticipated (Dkt. No. 103) be granted in part. Neither party has filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation.

Having considered the Report, IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 195) is hereby ADOPTED. Navico’s Motion (Dkt. No. 103) is therefore GRANTED IN PART. Specifically, Navico’s Motion is GRANTED with respect to the Kongsberg MS1000 System and claims 48, 49, 61, and 62 of the ’022 Patent, but otherwise DENIED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Navico, Inc. et al v. Garmin International, Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00190 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 31, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_16-cv-00190-6
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_16-cv-00190-6

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case