Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Navico, Inc. et al v. Garmin International, Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00190 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 8, 2017)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00190, Dkt. No. 190
Decided
August 8, 2017
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 161 Report and Recommendation, (Navicos Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Assignor Estoppel and the Validity of the 022 Patent (Dkt. No. 104) is DENIED) AND 166 Report and Recommendati…
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

NAVICO INC. and NAVICO § HOLDING AS, §

§ Plaintiffs, § § v. § NO. 2:16-CV-00190-JRG-RSP § GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. and § GARMIN USA, INC., §

§ Defendants. §

ORDER

The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Before the Court are various recommendations by Magistrate Judge Payne. Neither party has filed any objections to these recommendations. Having reviewed each Report and Recommendation, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

(1) Magistrate Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 161) recommending

denial of Navico’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Assignor Estoppel and the Validity of the ’022 Patent (Dkt. No. 104) is hereby ADOPTED. Navico’s Motion (Dkt. No. 104) is therefore DENIED.

(2) Magistrate Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 166) recommending

denial of Navico’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Infringement of the ’022 Patent (Dkt. No. 101) is hereby ADOPTED. Navico’s Motion (Dkt. No. 101) is therefore DENIED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Navico, Inc. et al v. Garmin International, Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00190 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 8, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_16-cv-00190-3
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_16-cv-00190-3

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.