Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Beneficial Innovations, Inc. v. advance Publications, Inc. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00229 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 14, 2014)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Indefiniteness Summary Judgment
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00229, Dkt. No. 496
Decided
January 14, 2014
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 466 Report and Recommendations, Denying Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness 307
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

BENEFICIAL INNOVATIONS, INC., §

§ Plaintiff, § § v. §

Case No. 2:11-CV-229-JRG-RSP

§ ADVANCE PUBLICATIONS, INC., ET §

AL., §

§ Defendants.

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant Amazon’s “Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness” (Dkt. No. 307, filed May 30, 2013). The Magistrate Judge filed a report recommending that the motion be denied. (Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 466, filed December 13, 2013).

After reviewing the objected to portions of the Report and Recommendation de novo, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation should be, and is hereby, ADOPTED. Accordingly, Beneficial’s “Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness” (Dkt. No. 307) is DENIED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Beneficial Innovations, Inc. v. advance Publications, Inc. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00229 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 14, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_11-cv-00229-2
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_11-cv-00229-2

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case