Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Beneficial Innovations, Inc. v. advance Publications, Inc. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00229 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 14, 2014)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Motion to Dismiss Attorneys' Fees
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00229, Dkt. No. 495
Decided
January 14, 2014
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 462 granting Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 384
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

GOOGLE INC., §

§ Plaintiff, § § v. § Case No. 2:11-CV-229-JRG-RSP § BENEFICIAL INNOVATIONS, INC., §

§ Defendant. §

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant Beneficial’s “Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings re Count II in Google’s Complaint in Intervention (for Attorney’s Fees Under Texas Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §28.001(8))” (Dkt. No. 384, filed October 14, 2013). The Magistrate Judge filed a report recommending that the motion be granted. (Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 462, filed December 10, 2013).

No portion of the Report and Recommendation was objected to. The Court finds that the Report and Recommendation should be, and is hereby, ADOPTED. Accordingly, Beneficial’s “Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings re Count II in Google’s Complaint in Intervention (for Attorney’s Fees Under Texas Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §28.001(8))” (Dkt. No. 384) is GRANTED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Beneficial Innovations, Inc. v. advance Publications, Inc. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00229 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 14, 2014).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_11-cv-00229-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_11-cv-00229-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case