Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Aliphcom v. Wi-Lan, Inc., No. 2:10-cv-00498 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 13, 2010)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00498, Dkt. No. 24
Decided
August 13, 2010
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
STIPULATION AND ORDER setting hearing date for Motion to Dismiss to November 4, 2010, signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 08/13/2010. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2010) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/19/2010.].
Length
3 pages

1 ERIC S. WALTERS (CA SBN 151933)

EWalters@mofo.com

2 ERIKA L. YAWGER (CA SBN 234919)

EYawger@mofo.com

3 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

755 Page Mill Road

4 Palo Alto, CA 94304-1018

Telephone: 650.813.5600

5 Facsimile: 650-494-0792 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff

ALIPHCOM

7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11 12 ALIPHCOM, a California corporation, Case No. 3:10-cv-02337-LHK 13 Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO CONTINUE DATES

14 v. FOR HEARING AND CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

15 WI-LAN, INC., a Canadian corporation, 16 Defendant. [Civil L.R. 7-12] 17 18 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiff Aliphcom (“Aliph”) and Defendant Wi-LAN, 19 Inc. (“Wi-LAN”), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and 20 jointly request that the Court continue the September 7, 2010 Initial Case Management 21 Conference and hearing on Wi-LAN’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and/or 22 Motion to Transfer (“Motion to Dismiss and/or Transfer”) as follows: 23 WHEREAS, on July 28, 2010, Defendant Wi-LAN filed its Motion to Dismiss and/or 24 Transfer; and, 25 WHEREAS, on August 2, 2010, this case was reassigned from Hon. Judge Susan Illston 26 to Hon. Judge Lucy H. Koh, and all pending motion dates and hearings were taken off-calendar; 27 and,

21 WHEREAS, on August 9, 2010, the Parties received the Clerk’s Notice Directing Counsel 2 to Re-Notice Motions, which set the Initial Case Management Conference for September 7, 2010 3 and directed counsel to re-notice the Motion to Dismiss and/or Transfer for September 7, 2010; 4 and, 5 WHEREAS, Aliph and Wi-LAN are in the process of meeting and conferring regarding 6 the timing and scope of any discovery that Aliph intends to pursue concerning the jurisdiction and 7 venue issues raised in Wi-LAN’s Motion to Dismiss and/or Transfer prior to filing its Opposition 8 thereto; and, 9 WHEREAS, as a matter of judicial economy, the Parties agree that the date for the Initial 10 Case Management Conference should be continued to coincide with the Parties’ new requested 11 date for the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss and/or Transfer; 12 THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree and request that the Court continue 13 the date for the hearing on Wi-LAN’s Motion to Dismiss and/or Transfer and the Initial Case 14 Management Conference to November 4, 2010. The Parties further stipulate and agree that last 15 day for Aliph to file its Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss and/or Transfer will be October 11, 16 2010, and the last day for Wi-LAN to file its Reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss and/or 17 Transfer will be October 18, 2010. 18 Furthermore, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)(2) and Civil Local Rule 16, the Parties 19 hereby stipulate and agree and request that the last day for the parties to file Joint Case 20 Management Conference Statements pursuant to paragraphs 10 and 11 of Judge Koh’s 21 Reassignment Order shall be continued to October 21, 2010. 22 23 24 25 26 27

31 Dated: August 12, 2010 ERIC S. WALTERS

ERIKA L. YAWGER

2 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

3

By: /s/ Eric S. Walters

ERIC S. WALTERS

4

Attorneys for Plaintiff ALIPHCOM

5 6

Dated: August 12, 2010 LAURA A. HANDLEY MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.

7 8

By: /s/ Laura A. Handley 9

LAURA A. HANDLEY

Attorneys for Defendant

10

WI-LAN INC.

11 12

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

13 I hereby attest that I have obtained the concurrence in the filing of this document by the 14 signatories indicated by a conformed “s/” signature. I will maintain records that support this 15 concurrence that can be made available for inspection upon request. 16

Dated: August 12, 2010 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 17 18

By: s/Eric S. Walters

ERIC S. WALTERS

19

Attorneys for Plaintiff ALIPHCOM

20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED.

23

Dated: Augus_t_ 1_3_, 201 0 ______________________________ The Honorable Lucy H. Koh

24

United States District Judge 25 26 27

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Aliphcom v. Wi-Lan, Inc., No. 2:10-cv-00498 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 13, 2010).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_10-cv-00498-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_10-cv-00498-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.