Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Aliphcom v. Wi-Lan, Inc., No. 2:10-cv-00498 (E.D. Tex. July 28, 2010)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:10-cv-00498, Dkt. No. 15
Decided
July 28, 2010
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting extension to respond re 14. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2010) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/19/2010.].
Length
2 pages

1 MCKOOL SMITH P.C.

Laura Handley [SBN 171478] 2 lhandley@mckoolsmith.com

300 W. 6th Street, Suite 1700 3 Austin, TX 78701

Telephone: (512) 692-8748 4 Facsimile: (512) 692-8744 5 Attorneys for specially appearing

Defendant Wi-LAN Inc. 6 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

10 11 12 ALIPHCOM, a California corporation, Case No. CV-10-02337 SI

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND 13 Plaintiff,

TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED

COMPLAINT

14 v. 15 WI-LAN INC., a Canadian corporation

Amended Complaint Filed: July 1, 2010 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

2Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Defendant Wi-LAN Inc. (“Wi-LAN”) hereby submits 2

the following stipulation between the parties in this action extending the time for its response 3

to Plaintiff Aliphcom's (“Aliph’s”) Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment of Patent 4

Invalidity, Noninfringement and Unenforceability (“Complaint”): 5

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Aliph and Defendant Wi-LAN have met and conferred concerning 6

extending the time within which Wi-LAN may respond to Aliph’s Complaint, and 7

WHEREAS, Aliph and Wi-LAN have mutually agreed to a two (2) day extension of time 8

for Wi-LAN to file a response to the Complaint, 9

THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated and agreed that the time in which Wi-LAN may 10

respond to the Complaint is extended for two (2) days. Wi-LAN will file its response to the 11 July 28, 2010

Complaint on or before . 12

So stipulated, 13

DATED: July 26, 2010 McKool Smith, P.C. 14

By: /s/ Laura Handley________________ Laura Handley 15

Attorney for specially appearing Defendant Wi-LAN Inc. 16 17

DATED: July 26, 2010 Morrison & Foerster LLP 18

By: /s/ Eric S. Walters_______________________ Eric S. Walters 19

Attorney for plaintiff Aliphcom 20 21

Upon the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor, it is 22

SO ORDERED.

23

Dated: _____________, 2010 By: ________________________________ United States District Court Judge 24 25 26 27

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Aliphcom v. Wi-Lan, Inc., No. 2:10-cv-00498 (E.D. Tex. July 28, 2010).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_10-cv-00498-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_10-cv-00498-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.