Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Broadcom Corporation et al v. WI-Lan, Inc.,, No. 2:09-cv-00322 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 25, 2009)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:09-cv-00322, Dkt. No. 32
Decided
March 25, 2009
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER FOLLOWING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; SETTING HEARING DATE FORDEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS OR TRANSFER. Set/Reset Deadlines as to (31 in 5:08-cv-04555-JW) MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Motion Hearing set for 5/1/2009 01:…
Length
3 pages

2

3

4

5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7 SAN JOSE DIVISION

8 Intel Corp., NO. C 08-04555 JW

___________________________________/ NO. C 08-05543 JW

9 NO. C 08-05544 JW

Broadcom Corp., NO. C 08-05624 JW

10 ___________________________________/ NO. C 08-05742 JW

ttrr 11 Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. ORDER FOLLOWING CASE uuoo ___________________________________/ MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;

aann 12 SETTING HEARING DATE FOR CC ii rroo Acer America Corp., DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS tt ff cc iill

aa 13 ___________________________________/ OR TRANSFER ii CC rr

ff tt oo ss tt

ccttss 14 Sony Computer Entertainment America, ii ii DD rr iiDD Inc., et al., ss ee nn 15

rr tt ee

hhrr Plaintiffs, aa tt tt oo SS NN eehh 16 v. dd

tt ee rr

oo 17 Wi-Lan, Inc., tt FF ii nn UU

18 Defendant.

/

19

On March 16, 2009, the Court conducted a Case Management Conference. Counsel for the 20

respective parties were present. In light of the discussion at the Conference, the Court orders as 21

follows:

22

(1) The Court adopts the briefing schedule set out in the parties’ Joint Case Management 23

Statement for Defendant’s pending Motion to Dismiss, with the following 24

modification: The Court will conduct a hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or 25

Transfer on May 1, 2009 at 1:30 p.m.1

26

27

21 (2) Ten (10) days after the Court rules on Defendant’s Motion in the Intel action, the

2 parties shall inform the Court of their proposals for moving forward with litigation in

3 all five related actions. The Court will set a date for a further Case Management

4 Conference in its order addressing Defendant’s Motion.

5

6 Dated: March 25, 2009

JAMES WARE

7 United States District Judge

8

9

10

t 11 r u o

a 12 C i

n r o t f c il

a 13 i C r

f t o s t

c 14 i i D r

ts iD s e n 15

r t e

h a t

r t o S N 16

e h d

t e r

o 17 t F i n U

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

31 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:

2 A. James Isbester jamie@itpatentcounsel.com

Adam R. Alper aalper@kirkland.com

3 Christian Chadd Taylor ctaylor@kirkland.com

Gayle Esther Rosenstein gklein@mckoolsmith.com

4 George C. Best gbest@foley.com

Gregory S. Arovas garovas@kirkland.com

5 John M. Desmarais jdesmarais@kirkland.com

Megan M Chung mmchung@townsend.com

6 Michael C. Spillner mspillner@orrick.com

Michael Woodrow De Vries mike.devries@lw.com

7 Robert A. Cote rcote@mckoolsmith.com

8

9

10 Dated: March 25, 2009 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

t 11 r uo By: /s/ JW Chambers

an 12 Elizabeth Garcia C i ro Courtroom Deputy t f c il

a 13 i C r

f t o s t

c 14 i i D r

ts iD s e n 15

r t e

h a t

r t o S N 16

e h d

t e r

o 17 t F i n U

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

Footnotes

  1. 1 Due to the Court’s unavailability, the Court continues the hearing from April 24, 2009 to this date.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Broadcom Corporation et al v. WI-Lan, Inc.,, No. 2:09-cv-00322 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 25, 2009).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_09-cv-00322-4
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_09-cv-00322-4

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.