Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Broadcom Corporation et al v. WI-Lan, Inc.,, No. 2:09-cv-00322 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 5, 2009)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:09-cv-00322, Dkt. No. 8
Decided
January 5, 2009
Judge
Edward M. Chen, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER re 7 Stipulation filed by WI-Lan, Inc.,
Length
3 pages

1 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP

Daniel J. Furniss (State Bar No. 73531) 2

A. James Isbester (State Bar No. 129820)

Two Embarcadero Center Eighth Floor 3

San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 576-0200 4

Facsimile: (415) 576-0300 5 Email: djfurniss@townsend.com

jisbester@townsend.com 6

Attorneys for specially appearing defendant 7

Wi-LAN, Inc. 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11 12

BROADCOM CORPORATION and Case No. C 08-CV-5543 EMC 13

ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

14 EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO

Plaintiffs,

COMPLAINT

15

v. 16

WI-LAN, INC.,

17

Defendant. 18 19 20

Specially appearing defendant Wi-LAN, Inc., by and through its counsel, requests that 21

defendant’s time to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint herein be extended until 22

February 2, 2009. 23

This stipulated request is made on the grounds that defendant requires the additional time 24

in which to prepare an appropriate response. The complaint in this case was filed on 25

December 10, 2008. Defendant’s time to respond to the complaint has not been previously 26

extended by order or stipulation. Neither Plaintiff Broadcom Corporation nor Atheros 27

Communications, Inc. opposes defendant’s requested extension.

2So stipulated, 2 3 Dated: December 31, 2008 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 4

By: /S/ 5

A. James Isbester (SBN 129820)

Email: jisbester@townsend.com 6

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND

7 CREW LLP

Two Embarcadero Center Eighth Floor 8 San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 576-0200 9

Facsimile: (415) 576-0300 10

Attorneys for specially appearing defendant 11 Wi-LAN, Inc. 12

Dated: December 31, 2008 LATHAM & WATKINS, LLP 13

By: /S/ 14

Eli T. Ticatch (SBN 234108) 15 Eli.ticatch@lw.com

Latham & Watkins, LLP 16

650 Town Center Drive, 20th Floor Orange County, California 92626-1925 17

Telephone: (714) 540-1235 Facsimile: (714) 755-8290 18 19 Attorneys for plaintiff Broadcom Corporation 20

Dated: December 31, 2008 REED SMITH, LLP 21

By: /S/

Jonah D. Mitchell 22

jmitchellsbaker@reedsmith.com 23 Reed Smith LLP

Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 2000 24

San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 543-8700 25

Facsimile: (415) 391-8269 26

Attorneys for Atheros Communications, Inc.

3Upon the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor, it is SO ORDERED. 2 3 4 Dated: _______________, 2008 By:

United States District Court Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Broadcom Corporation et al v. WI-Lan, Inc.,, No. 2:09-cv-00322 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 5, 2009).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_09-cv-00322-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_09-cv-00322-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.