Fed. Cir.

Lexmark International, Inc. v. Impression Products, Inc., No. 14-1617 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 12, 2016)

Errata

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 14-1617
Also Docketed: No. 14-1619 (consolidated; same document)
Decided: February 12, 2016
Judge: See opinion
Document: Precedential Opinion
Length: 1 page

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

March 28, 2016

ERRATUM

Appeal Nos. 2014-1617, 2014-1619

LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant

IMPRESSION PRODUCTS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant

QUALITY CARTRIDGES, INC., JOHN DOES, 1-20, BLUE TRADING LLC, EXPRINT INTERNATIONAL,

INC., LD PRODUCTS, INC., PRINTRONIC

CORPORATION, TESEN DEVELOPMENT (HONG

KONG) CO. LTD., BENIGNO ADEVA AND HIS

COMPANIES,

Defendants

Decided: February 12, 2016

Precedential Opinion

On page 19, line 13 of the opinion, “disjunction” has been changed to “disjunctive.”

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Lexmark International, Inc. v. Impression Products, Inc., No. 14-1617 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 12, 2016).

govinfo ID: USCOURTS-ca13-14-01617-2
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-14-01617-2

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error