Lexmark International, Inc. v. Impression Products, Inc., No. 14-1617 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 12, 2016)

The attached opinion announcing the judgment of the court in your case was filed and judgment was entered on the date indicated above. The mandate will be issued in due course. Information is also provided about petitions for rehearing and suggestions for rehearing en banc. The questions and answers are those frequently asked and answered by the Clerk's Office. Costs are taxed against the appellant in favor of the appellee under Rule 39. The party entitled to costs is provided a bill of costs form and an instruction sheet with this notice. The parties are encouraged to stipulate to the costs. A bill of costs will be presumed correct in the absence of a timely filed objection. Costs are payable to the party awarded costs. If costs are awarded to the government, they should be paid to the Treasurer of the United States. Where costs are awarded against the government, payment should be made to the person(s) designated under the governing statutes, the court's orders, and the parties' written settlement agreements. In cases between private parties, payment should be made to counsel for the party awarded costs or, if the party is not represented by counsel, to the party pro se. Payment of costs should not be sent to the court. Costs should be paid promptly. If the court also imposed monetary sanctions, they are payable to the opposing party unless the court's opinion provides otherwise. Sanctions should be paid in the same way as costs. Regarding exhibits and visual aids: Your attention is directed Fed. R. App. P. 34(g) which states that the clerk may destroy or dispose of the exhibits if counsel does not reclaim them within a reasonable time after the clerk gives notice to remove them. (The clerk deems a reasonable time to be 15 days from the date the final mandate is issued.)

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole Clerk of Court

cc: Frederick M. Abbott John R. Alison III Christa M. Anderson James Scott Ballenger P. Douglas Barr

Margreth Barrett Jamie B. Beaber Benjamin Beaton Sara Beccia Garrard R. Beeney Merritt Blakeslee Adam R. Brebner Roger Brooks Sarah Burg Gino Cheng

2Joseph S. Cianfrani Kathi A. Cover Samuel Drezdzon Charles Duan Barbara A. Fiacco Theodore Lawrence Field Joshua John Fougere Mark R. Freeman Seth David Greenstein Jennifer Herbst Hamilton Walter E. Hanley Jr. Robert T. Haslam John D. Haynes Timothy P. Heaton Audra Carol Eidem Heinze Steven A. Hirsch Robert N. Hochman Tihua Huang Paul Whitfield Hughes Matthew R. Hulse Katherine H. Johnson Philip Staton Johnson Lisa K. Jorgenson David J. Kappos William Douglas Kari James R. Klaiber Leo L. Lam Kristan Lynn Lansbery Noah Leibowitz Michael Brett Levin Kfir Levy Matthew A. Levy Charles Lifland Steven B. Loy Phillip R. Malone Bryan Medlock Jr. Timothy Colin Meece Matthew J. Moore John Nilsson Willow White Noonan Edward F. O'Connor I Brian P. O'Shaughnessy Mohammed Raza Panjwani Melissa N. Patterson Jeffrey Theodore Pearlman Aaron Ligoury Joseph Pereira Andrew John Pincus Vera Ranieri Maura L. Rees Kevin H. Rhodes Susan Roeder David F. Ryan Meenakshi Kala Sarvaiya Christopher M. Scharff Mark Schonfeld Steven C. Sereboff Nathan Shaffer Melissa Arbus Sherry Jason Steven Shull Kent N. Shum Owais Ahmed Siddiqui Sherwin Siy

3David S. Steuer Daniel Stringfield Ranganath Sudarshan James Suh Robert Anthony Surrette Robert P. Taylor Constantine L. Trela Jr. Susan Van Keulen Robert A. Van Nest Herbert Clare Wamsley Jr. Peter James Wied Vincent K. Yip Kristin Leigh Yohannan Moore 14-1617 - Lexmark International, Inc. v. Impression Products, Inc. 14-1619 - Lexmark International, Inc. v. Impression Products, Inc. (Cross-Appeal) United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Case No. 1:10-cv-00564-MRB