Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Raggio, No. 25-1255 (Fed. Cir. June 20, 2025)

Vacated & Remanded
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 25-1255
Decided
June 20, 2025
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Order on Motion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit In Re DOUGLAS PAUL RAGGIO,

Appellant 2025-1255

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 16/044,281.

ON MOTION

Before REYNA, MAYER, and CHEN, Circuit Judges.

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s unopposed motion to remand this case to the agency, which “acknowledges that the [Patent Trial and Appeal] Board relied on undesignated new grounds of rejection in its analysis of the secondary considerations evidence that are applicable to all of the rejected claims and when taking Official Notice of the wrapping limitation of claim 17” and “asks that this case be remanded to allow the agency to reconsider those rejections,” ECF No. 18 at 3,

22 IN RE RAGGIO

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. The case is remanded to the USPTO for further proceedings.

(2) Each party shall bear its own costs as to this appeal.

FOR THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

June 20, 2025 Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Raggio, No. 25-1255 (Fed. Cir. June 20, 2025).

Record ID
CAFC-25-1255-20250620
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-25-1255-20250620

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.