Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

GUI Global Products, Ltd. v. Apple Inc., No. 22-2257 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 11, 2024)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-2257
Decided
April 11, 2024
Judge
Prost, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

GUI GLOBAL PRODUCTS, LTD., DBA GWEE,

Appellant

v.

APPLE INC.,

Appellee

2022-2257, 2022-2258, 2022-2259, 2022-2260

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2021-00470, IPR2021-00471, IPR2021-00472, IPR2021-00473.

Before PROST, SCHALL, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.

O R D E R

Apple Inc. petitioned for inter partes review of claims 1–10 and 16–19 of U.S. Patent No. 10,259,020 (“the ’020 patent”), claims 1, 2, 4–10, 12, 14–17, and 19 of U.S. Patent No. 10,259,021 (“the ’021 patent”), claims 1–5 and 7–13 of U.S. Patent No. 10,562,077 (“the ’077 patent”), and claims 1–5 and 7–13 of U.S. Patent No. 10,589,320 (“the ’320 patent”). In four final written decisions, the Patent Trial and2 2 GUI GLOBAL PRODUCTS, LTD. v. APPLE INC.

Appeal Board (“Board”) determined that the challenged claims were unpatentable over the asserted prior art. Apple Inc. v. GUI Glob. Prods., Ltd., No. IPR2021-00470, 2022 WL 3331044 (P.T.A.B. Aug. 11, 2022); Apple Inc. v. GUI Glob. Prods., Ltd., No. IPR2021-00471, 2022 WL 2960347 (P.T.A.B. July 26, 2022); Apple Inc. v. GUI Glob. Prods., Ltd., No. IPR2021-00472, 2022 WL 2959606 (P.T.A.B. July 26, 2022); Apple Inc. v. GUI Glob. Prods., Ltd., No. IPR2021-00473, 2022 WL 3219668 (P.T.A.B. Aug. 9, 2022). GUI Global Products, Ltd. (“Gwee”) timely appealed each final written decision, and we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(4)(A).

In a decision issued today in consolidated companion appeals, we affirmed the Board’s determination that all claims of the ’020, ’021, ’077, and ’320 patents were unpatentable. GUI Glob. Prods., Ltd. v. Samsung Elecs. Co., Nos. 22-2156, 22-2157, 22-2158, 22-2159. Gwee’s appeals here are moot in light of that decision. Cisco Sys., Inc. v. TQ Delta, LLC, 928 F.3d 1359, 1361 (Fed. Cir. 2019).

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

These appeals are dismissed as moot in light of our affirmance in GUI Global Products, Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Nos. 22-2156, 22-2157, 22-2158, 22-2159.

FOR THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

April 11, 2024

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

GUI Global Products, Ltd. v. Apple Inc., No. 22-2257 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 11, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-22-2257-20240411
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-2257-20240411

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.