Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Analog Devices, Inc. v. Xilinx Asia Pacific PTE. Ltd., No. 22-1818 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 12, 2022)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1818
Decided
December 12, 2022
Judge
Stark, J.
Document
Order on Motion
Length
3 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ANALOG DEVICES, INC.,

Appellant

v.

XILINX ASIA PACIFIC PTE. LTD., XILINX, INC.,

Appellees

2022-1818

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-01531.

In re: XILINX, INC., XILINX ASIA PACIFIC PTE.

LTD.,

Appellants

2022-1856

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-01531.

2ON MOTION

Before STARK, Circuit Judge.

O R D E R

Upon consideration of Analog Devices, Inc.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss Appeal No. 2022-1818, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b), and to withdraw from Appeal No. 2022-1856, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. Appeal No. 2022-1818 is dismissed. Analog Devices is withdrawn from Appeal No. 2022-1856. The revised official captions and short caption for Appeal No. 2022-1856 are reflected in this order. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs as to Appeal No. 2022-1818. (3) The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) is directed to inform the court within 30 days of the date of filing of this order whether it intends to intervene in Appeal No. 2022-1856. (4) If the PTO elects to participate as intervenor, its docketing statement is due within 14 days of the date of filing of its notice of intervention and its brief is due within 40 days of the date of filing of Xilinx, Inc. and Xilinx Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd.’s (collectively, “Xilinx”) opening brief.

3(5) Xilinx’s opening brief is due within 60 days of the date of filing of this order.

FOR THE COURT

DECEMBER 12, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE (AS TO 2022-1818 ONLY):

December 12, 2022

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Analog Devices, Inc. v. Xilinx Asia Pacific PTE. Ltd., No. 22-1818 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 12, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1818-20221212
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1818-20221212

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.