Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Raffel Systems, LLC v. MAN WAH Holdings Limited, No. 20-2126 (Fed. Cir. June 10, 2021)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-2126
Decided
June 10, 2021
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages
Patents at issueU.S. Patent No. D821986

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

RAFFEL SYSTEMS, LLC,

Appellant

v.

MAN WAH HOLDINGS LIMITED,

Appellee

2020-2126

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. PGR2019-00029.

Decided: June 10, 2021

JOHN C. SCHELLER, Michael Best & Friedrich, LLP, Madison, WI, for appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL BESS, BRIANNA JANE SIEBKEN, CHICAGO, IL; DAVID A. CASIMIR, TYLER SISK, Casimir Jones, S.C., Middleton, WI. GARY HNATH, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC, for appellee. Also represented by CLARK BAKEWELL, MICHAEL LOUIS LINDINGER, MINH NGUYEN-DANG, NICOLE A. SAHARSKY; HAO TAN, SHEN WANG, Arch & Lake LLP, Chicago, IL.

22 RAFFEL SYSTEMS, LLC v. MAN WAH HOLDINGS LIMITED

Before REYNA, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.

Raffel Systems, LLC appeals the decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board concluding that claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. D821,986 is unpatentable under the on-sale bar. The Board found that an email sent by patent owner Raffel offered for sale an embodiment of the claim in small quantities on-demand over a year before the priority date of the patent. We have considered the appellant’s arguments that the Board’s on-sale determination was unsupported by substantial evidence and find them unpersuasive. We therefore affirm.

AFFIRMED

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Raffel Systems, LLC v. MAN WAH Holdings Limited, No. 20-2126 (Fed. Cir. June 10, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-20-2126-20210610
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-2126-20210610

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.