Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Biogen MA Inc., No. 20-1673 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 25, 2022)

Vacated & Remanded
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-1673
Decided
October 25, 2022
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,

Appellant

v.

BIOGEN MA, INC.,

Appellee

2020-1673

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018-01403.

ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING

Before REYNA, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges*.

22 MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. v. BIOGEN MA INC.

O R D E R

Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Biogen MA Inc. filed a joint status report on October 17, 2022, detailing the Supreme Court’s denial of Biogen’s petition for certiorari in the companion case, Biogen Int’l GmbH v. Mylan Pharms. Inc., 18 F.4th 1333, 1346 (Fed. Cir. 2021), cert. denied, 2022 WL 4652058, at *1 (Oct. 3, 2022). In the companion case, Appeal No. 1933, this court found the ’514 patent invalid for lack of written description under 35 U.S.C. § 112. Accordingly, in this appeal, Appeal No. 20-1673, both parties agree that there is an absence of a live controversy and ask that this court vacate the Board’s final written decision and remand with instructions to dismiss the IPR. In light of our precedent, we agree with the parties that this appeal is moot and the underlying final written decision should be vacated. See Apple Inc. v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., 976 F.3d 1316, 1321 (Fed. Cir. 2020) (vacating Board decisions on patentability and remanding with instructions to dismiss IPRs as to those claims because a district court’s invalidation of those claims rendered the appeal moot (citing United States v. Munsingwear, Inc. 340 U.S. 36, 39–41 (1950))). Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Board’s final written decision issued on February 2, 2020 is vacated. (2) The Board is instructed to dismiss the inter partes petition.

FOR THE COURT

October 25, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Footnotes

  1. * Circuit Judge O’Malley, who served on the merits panel in this case, retired on March 11, 2022. Circuit Judge Reyna and Circuit Judge Hughes have acted as a quorum with respect to this order. See Fed. Cir. R. 47.11.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Biogen MA Inc., No. 20-1673 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 25, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-20-1673-20221025
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-1673-20221025

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.