Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Visa Inc. v. Universal Secure Registry, LLC, No. 20-1662 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 27, 2021)

Vacated & Remanded
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-1662
Decided
August 27, 2021
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

VISA INC., VISA U.S.A. INC., APPLE INC.,

Appellants

v.

UNIVERSAL SECURE REGISTRY, LLC,

Appellee

2020-1662

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018-01350.

Decided: August 27, 2021

MATTHEW A. ARGENTI, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, PC, Palo Alto, CA, argued for all appellants. Appellants Visa Inc., Visa U.S.A. Inc. also represented by MICHAEL T. ROSATO, Seattle, WA.

MARK D. SELWYN, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for appellant Apple Inc. Also represented by BRITTANY BLUEITT AMADI, Washington, DC; MARK CHRISTOPHER FLEMING, MONICA GREWAL, Boston, MA.

22 VISA INC. v. UNIVERSAL SECURE REGISTRY, LLC

CHRISTOPHER MATHEWS, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by TIGRAN GULEDJIAN.

Before NEWMAN, PROST*, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges.

The patent at issue in this appeal is U.S. Patent No. 8,856,539, owned by Universal Secure Registry LLC (USR). Visa filed a petition for an inter partes review, challenging several claims of the ’539 patent before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, which instituted the requested review and eventually issued a final written decision that Visa had not shown the challenged claims to be unpatentable. In another case, we have affirmed a district court’s judgment that all claims of the ’539 patent are patent ineligible. Universal Secure Registry LLC v. Apple Inc., No. 20-2044 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 26, 2021). Therefore, as the parties agreed at oral argument, this appeal involving the ’539 patent is now moot. Apple Inc. v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., 976 F.3d 1316, 1321 (Fed. Cir. 2020); Oral Arg. at 12:10–12:50. We vacate the Board’s final written decision and remand for the Board to dismiss Visa’s petition. See Apple, 976 F.3d at 1321 (citing United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39–41 (1950)).

No costs.

VACATED AND REMANDED

Footnotes

  1. * Circuit Judge Sharon Prost vacated the position of Chief Judge on May 21, 2021.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Visa Inc. v. Universal Secure Registry, LLC, No. 20-1662 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 27, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-20-1662-20210827
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-1662-20210827

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.