Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Apple Inc. v. Universal Secure Registry LLC, No. 20-1330 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 27, 2021)

Vacated & Remanded
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-1330
Decided
August 27, 2021
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

APPLE INC.,

Appellant

v.

UNIVERSAL SECURE REGISTRY LLC,

Appellee

2020-1330

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018-00812.

Decided: August 27, 2021

BRITTANY BLUEITT AMADI, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by KEITH T. HOWELL; MONICA GREWAL, Boston, MA; MARK D. SELWYN, Palo Alto, CA. CHRISTOPHER MATHEWS, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by TIGRAN GULEDJIAN.

22 APPLE INC. v. UNIVERSAL SECURE REGISTRY LLC

Before NEWMAN, PROST*, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges.

The patent at issue in this appeal is U.S. Patent No. 8,856,539, owned by Universal Secure Registry LLC (USR). Apple filed a petition for an inter partes review, challenging several claims of the ’539 patent before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, which instituted the requested review and eventually issued a final written decision that Apple had not shown the challenged claims to be unpatentable. In another case, we have affirmed a district court’s judgment that all claims of the ’539 patent are patent ineligible. Universal Secure Registry LLC v. Apple Inc., No. 20-2044 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 26, 2021). Therefore, as the parties agreed at oral argument, this appeal involving the ’539 patent is now moot. Apple Inc. v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc., 976 F.3d 1316, 1321 (Fed. Cir. 2020); Oral Arg. at 7:00–7:55, 25:00–26:40. We vacate the Board’s final written decision and remand for the Board to dismiss Apple’s petition. See Apple, 976 F.3d at 1321 (citing United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39–41 (1950)).

No costs.

VACATED AND REMANDED

Footnotes

  1. * Circuit Judge Sharon Prost vacated the position of Chief Judge on May 21, 2021.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Apple Inc. v. Universal Secure Registry LLC, No. 20-1330 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 27, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-20-1330-20210827
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-1330-20210827

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.