Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Promptu Systems Corporation v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, No. 19-2368 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 17, 2024)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-2368
Decided
January 17, 2024
Judge
Moore, C.J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit PROMPTU SYSTEMS CORPORATION,

Appellant

v.

COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,

Appellee

2019-2368, 2019-2369

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2018-00342, IPR2018-00343.

Decided: January 17, 2024

JOSEPH MICHAEL SCHAFFNER, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Reston, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOSHUA GOLDBERG, Washington, DC; JACOB ADAM SCHROEDER, Palo Alto, CA. MARK ANDREW PERRY, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by JOSHUA HALPERN; JAMES L. DAY, JR., Farella Braun & Martel LLP, San Francisco, CA.

22 PROMPTU SYSTEMS CORPORATION v.

COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC

Before MOORE, Chief Judge, PROST and TARANTO, Circuit

Judges.

In light of our decision in Promptu Sys. Corp. v. Comcast Cable Commc’ns, LLC, No. 20-1253 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 16, 2024), we dismiss Appeal Nos. 19-2368 and 19-2369 as moot.

DISMISSED

COSTS

No costs.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Promptu Systems Corporation v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, No. 19-2368 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 17, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-19-2368-20240117
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-2368-20240117

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.