Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Sprint Communications Company v. Time Warner Cable, Inc., No. 17-2247 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 18, 2019)

Denied
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-2247
Decided
March 18, 2019
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P.,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TIME WARNER CABLE, INC., TIME WARNER

CABLE, LLC, TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT

COMPANY, L.P., TIME WARNER

ENTERTAINMENT-ADVANCE/NEWHOUSE

PARTNERSHIP, TWC COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES

(KANSAS), LLC,

Defendants-Appellants

2017-2247

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas in No. 2:11-cv-02686-JWL, Judge John W. Lungstrum.

ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING

Before CHEN, MAYER, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

O R D E R

22 SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY v. TIME WARNER CABLE,

INC. Appellants Time Warner Cable Information Services (Kansas), LLC, Time Warner Cable, Inc., Time Warner Cable, LLC, Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P., Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership and TWC Communications, LLC filed a petition for rehearing en banc. A response to the petition was invited by the court and filed by Appellee Sprint Communications Company, L.P. The petition was first referred to the panel. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The petition for panel rehearing is denied except as

described in paragraph (2) below.

(2) The previous nonprecedential opinion and judg-

ment in this appeal, issued November 30, 2018, are withdrawn and replaced with the modified nonprecedential opinion and judgment accompanying this order.

FOR THE COURT

March 18, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court .

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Sprint Communications Company v. Time Warner Cable, Inc., No. 17-2247 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 18, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-17-2247-20190318-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-17-2247-20190318-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.