Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Sprint Communications Company v. Time Warner Cable, Inc., No. 17-2247 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 18, 2019)

Denied
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 17-2247
Decided
March 18, 2019
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P.,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TIME WARNER CABLE, INC., TIME WARNER

CABLE, LLC, TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT

COMPANY, L.P., TIME WARNER

ENTERTAINMENT-ADVANCE/NEWHOUSE

PARTNERSHIP, TWC COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES

(KANSAS), LLC,

Defendants-Appellants

2017-2247

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas in No. 2:11-cv-02686-JWL, Judge John W. Lungstrum.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

2SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY v. TIME WARNER CABLE,

INC. Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, DYK, O’MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, TARANTO, CHEN, and

HUGHES, Circuit Judges*.

O R D E R

Appellants Time Warner Cable Information Services (Kansas), LLC, Time Warner Cable, Inc., Time Warner Cable, LLC, Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P., Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership and TWC Communications, LLC filed a petition for rehearing en banc. A response to the petition was invited by the court and filed by Appellee Sprint Communications Company, L.P. The petition was first referred to the panel that heard the appeal. The panel denied the petition except as described in the accompanying panel order. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The petition for rehearing en banc is denied. (2) The mandate of this court will issue on April 24,

2019.

FOR THE COURT

March 18, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
    • * Circuit Judges Moore and Stoll did not participate.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Sprint Communications Company v. Time Warner Cable, Inc., No. 17-2247 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 18, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-17-2247-20190318
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-17-2247-20190318

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.