Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Georgetown Rail 2 Equipment v. Holland L.P., No. 16-2297 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 16, 2017)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-2297
Decided
August 16, 2017
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit GEORGETOWN RAIL EQUIPMENT COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HOLLAND L.P.,

Defendant-Appellant

2016-2297

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 6:13-cv-00366-RWS, Judge Robert Schroeder, III.

SUA SPONTE

Before REYNA, SCHALL, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.

O R D E R

Upon consideration of this court’s show cause order of August 1, 2017, and the joint response submitted by the parties on August 15, 2017, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

22 GEORGETOWN RAIL EQUIPMENT v. HOLLAND L.P.

The opinion issued under seal on August 1, 2017 is hereby unsealed. FOR THE COURT

August 16, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Georgetown Rail 2 Equipment v. Holland L.P., No. 16-2297 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 16, 2017).

Record ID
CAFC-16-2297-20170816
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-16-2297-20170816

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.