Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Georgetown Rail Equipment v. Holland L.P., No. 16-2297 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 1, 2017)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-2297
Decided
August 1, 2017
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

GEORGETOWN RAIL EQUIPMENT COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HOLLAND L.P.,

Defendant-Appellant

2016-2297

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 6:13-cv-00366-RWS, Judge Robert Schroeder III.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Before REYNA, SCHALL, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.

22 GEORGETOWN RAIL EQUIP. CO. v. HOLLAND L.P.

Because the record in this case contains extensive material marked as confidential, the court has issued its opinion dated August 1, 2017 under seal. The court does not believe, however, that the opinion contains confidential material.

The parties are hereby ordered to show cause, by means of a single joint response coordinated among the parties, why the opinion should not be unsealed. The response to this order must specify which words, if any, are proposed to be redacted, and must specifically state the cause for each such requested redaction. If the parties propose redactions, the response to this order must also propose specific words to replace each of the proposed redactions in an unsealed opinion. The joint response shall be filed no later than August 15, 2017.

FOR THE COURT

August 1, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Georgetown Rail Equipment v. Holland L.P., No. 16-2297 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 1, 2017).

Record ID
CAFC-16-2297-20170801
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-16-2297-20170801

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.