Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Wi-Fi ONE, LLC v. Broadcom Corporation, No. 15-1945 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 20, 2018)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1945
Decided
April 20, 2018
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

WI-FI ONE, LLC,

Appellant

v.

BROADCOM CORPORATION,

Appellee

ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF

COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Intervenor

2015-1945

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013-00602.

Decided: April 20, 2018

DONALD PUCKETT, Nelson Bumgardner PC, Fort Worth, TX, for appellant. Also represented by DOUGLAS AARON CAWLEY, McKool Smith, PC, Dallas, TX; PETER J. AYERS, Law Office of Peter J. Ayers, Austin, TX.

22 WI-FI ONE, LLC v. BROADCOM CORP.

DOMINIC E. MASSA, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, MA, for appellee. Also represented by KEVIN GOLDMAN, KATIE SAXTON.

NATHAN K. KELLEY, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for intervenor. Also represented by KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FRANCES LYNCH; JOYCE R. BRANDA, MARK R. FREEMAN, MELISSA N. PATTERSON, NICHOLAS RILEY, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC.

Before DYK, BRYSON, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board is

AFFIRMED

REYNA, Circuit Judge, dissents for the reasons stated in

his dissenting opinion in Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corp., No. 2015-1944 (Fed. Cir. April 20, 2018).

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Wi-Fi ONE, LLC v. Broadcom Corporation, No. 15-1945 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 20, 2018).

Record ID
CAFC-15-1945-20180420
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-15-1945-20180420

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.