Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Click-To-Call Technologies, LP v. Ingenio, Inc., No. 15-1242 (Fed. Cir. May 28, 2020)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1242
Decided
May 28, 2020
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

CLICK-TO-CALL TECHNOLOGIES, LP,

Appellant

v.

INGENIO, INC., THRYV, INC., FKA DEX MEDIA,

INC., FKA YELLOWPAGES.COM, LLC,

Appellees

ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF

COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Intervenor

2015-1242

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013-00312.

SUA SPONTE

22 CLICK-TO-CALL TECHNOLOGIES, LP v. INGENIO, INC.

Before O’MALLEY and TARANTO, Circuit Judges, and

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States in Thryv, Inc., fka Dex Media, Inc. v. Click-To-Call Technologies, LP, et al., 140 S. Ct. 1367 (2020), vacating and remanding with instructions to dismiss for lack of appellate jurisdiction, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The mandate of this court issued on October 9, 2018, is recalled, the appeal is reinstated, and this court’s August 16, 2018, judgment is vacated. (2) The official caption is revised as reflected above in light of the notice filed by Thryv, Inc. at the Supreme Court. (3) The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The mandate shall reissue forthwith. (4) Each party shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

May 28, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Footnotes

  1. * The Honorable Leonard P. Stark, Chief District Judge, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, sitting by designation.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Click-To-Call Technologies, LP v. Ingenio, Inc., No. 15-1242 (Fed. Cir. May 28, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-15-1242-20200528
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-15-1242-20200528

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.