Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Krishnan, No. 14-1649 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 19, 2014)

Vacated & Remanded
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1649
Decided
September 19, 2014
Judge
O'Malley, J.
Document
Order on Motion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IN RE SCREENIVAS KRISHNAN, KOEN

BENNEBROEK, KARTHIK BHAT, STEFANO A.

PESCADOR, DAVID G. REED, BRAD W. SIMERAL,

AND EDWARD M. VEESER

2014-1649

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 11/610,411.

ON MOTION

Before O’MALLEY, WALLACH, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.

O R D E R

The Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) moves without opposition to remand this case to the PTO for further proceedings.

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board affirmed the Examiner’s rejection of certain claims, but the PTO concedes that the Board should reconsider its rejection in light of the PTO’s examination policy on “configured to” claim language.

22 IN RE KRISHNAN

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. This case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this order.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s30 ISSUED AS A MANDATE: September 19, 2014

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Krishnan, No. 14-1649 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 19, 2014).

Record ID
CAFC-14-1649-20140919
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-14-1649-20140919

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.