Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re John Gross, No. 14-1073 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 27, 2014)

Vacated & Remanded
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1073
Decided
March 27, 2014
Judge
Taranto, J.
Document
Order on Motion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IN RE JOHN NICHOLAS GROSS

2014-1073

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 10/770,937.

ON MOTION

Before PROST, O’MALLEY, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges.

O R D E R

The parties jointly move to remand this appeal for further proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

A Board decision sustained the examiner’s rejection of various claims of John N. Gross’s patent application as obvious over a combination of prior art references. After the Board’s decision, Gross requested a rehearing arguing that the Board’s decision constituted a new ground of rejection. The Board disagreed and denied the rehearing. Gross timely appealed to this court.

22 IN RE JOHN GROSS

The parties state that Gross now intends to raise the new ground of rejection issue on appeal. Because this court agrees with the parties that it would be best for all involved to remand this case to the Board for reconsideration of Gross’s new ground of rejection argument in light of Rambus Inc. v. Rea, 731 F.3d 1248 (Fed. Cir. 2013), the parties’ joint motion to remand the case for additional proceedings is granted.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. The Board’s decision is vacated and the case is remanded for additional proceedings consistent with this order. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Daniel E. O’Toole

Clerk of Court

s26 ISSUED AS A MANDATE: March 27, 2014

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re John Gross, No. 14-1073 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 27, 2014).

Record ID
CAFC-14-1073-20140327
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-14-1073-20140327

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.