Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Rambus, Inc., No. 13-1623 (Fed. Cir. May 30, 2014)

Vacated & Remanded
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1623
Decided
May 30, 2014
Judge
Newman, J.
Document
Order on Motion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IN RE RAMBUS, INC.,

2013-1623

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Reexamination No. 95/001,169.

ON MOTION

Before RADER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and HUGHES, Circuit

Judges.

O R D E R

The Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office moves to remand this matter to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to reconsider its decision in light of this court’s decision in Rambus, Inc. v. Rea, 2012-1480 (Fed. Cir. 2013). Rambus moves for an extension of time to file its response and opposes the motion to remand. The Director replies.

Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

22 IN RE RAMBUS, INC.

(1) The motion for an extension of time is granted. (2) The motion to remand is granted. The Board's decision is vacated and the case remanded for further proceedings.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Daniel E. O’Toole

Clerk of Court

s25 ISSUED AS A MANDATE: May 30, 2014

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Rambus, Inc., No. 13-1623 (Fed. Cir. May 30, 2014).

Record ID
CAFC-13-1623-20140530
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-13-1623-20140530

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.