Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Emadeldin Hassan, No. 13-1287 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 2, 2013)

Granted
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1287
Decided
August 2, 2013
Judge
Bryson, J.
Document
Order on Motion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IN RE EMADELDIN M. HASSAN, AQEEL A. FATMI,

AND NACHIAPPAN CHIDAMBARAM

2013-1287

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Serial No. 10/529,984.

ON MOTION

Before RADER, Chief Judge, BRYSON and WALLACH, Cir-

cuit Judges.

O R D E R

The parties jointly move to waive the requirements of Fed. Cir. R. 27(f) and to remand to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) to reconsider the opinion currently on appeal and the pending claims.

The Board rejected the claims in the patent application at issue as obvious over prior art Okajima in combination with other references. We agree with the parties that the Board’s decision attributes to Okajima a teaching

2IN RE EMADELDIN HASSAN 2 of soft capsules without analysis or discussion of Okajima’s repeated references to hard capsules. For at least this reason, remand is appropriate.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The motion to remand is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk

s26 ISSUED AS A MANDATE: August 2, 2013

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Emadeldin Hassan, No. 13-1287 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 2, 2013).

Record ID
CAFC-13-1287-20130802
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-13-1287-20130802

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.