Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Avocent Redmond Corp., No. 13-1078 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 11, 2013)

Granted
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1078
Decided
April 11, 2013
Judge
Moore, J.
Document
Order on Motion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IN RE AVOCENT REDMOND CORP.

2013-1078

(Reexamination No. 90/010,626)

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

ON MOTION

Before PROST, MOORE, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges.

O R D E R

The Solicitor of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (Solicitor) moves without opposition to remand this case to the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board).

The Solicitor states that remand is required for the Board to address Avocent Redmond Corp.’s outstanding request to reopen prosecution.

2IN RE AVOCENT REDMOND CORP. 2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. The case is remanded.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk s26 ISSUED AS MANDATE: April 11, 2013

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Avocent Redmond Corp., No. 13-1078 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 11, 2013).

Record ID
CAFC-13-1078-20130411
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-13-1078-20130411

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.