Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Nissim Corp. v. REA, No. 12-1409 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 2, 2013)

Granted
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1409
Decided
August 2, 2013
Judge
Bryson, J.
Document
Order on Motion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

NISSIM CORP.,

Appellant,

v.

Teresa Stanek Rea, ACTING DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK

OFFICE,

Appellee,

AND

TIME WARNER, INC., WARNER BROS.

ENTERTAINMENT, INC., WARNER HOME VIDEO,

AND NEW LINE HOME ENTERTAINMENT,

Appellees.

2012-1409

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in Reexamination No. 95/000,312.

ON MOTION

2NISSIM CORP. v. REA 2 Before RADER, Chief Judge BRYSON, and WALLACH, Circuit

Judges.

O R D E R

The parties jointly move to remand this appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”) due to settlement.

The parties state that they have settled the case and move to remand so that the Board can consider a petition to terminate the underlying reexamination. We grant the motion. In doing so, however, we take no position as to whether the Board should grant the petition.

Upon consideration thereof, It is ordered that: The motion to remand is granted.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: August 2, 2013 s25

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Nissim Corp. v. REA, No. 12-1409 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 2, 2013).

Record ID
CAFC-12-1409-20130802
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-12-1409-20130802

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.