Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re John, No. 10-1222 (Fed. Cir. May 19, 2010)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1222
Decided
May 19, 2010
Judge
Gajarsa, J.
Document
Order on Motion
Length
2 pages

Note: This order is nonprecedential. Gnited States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

(Reexamination No. 90/008,8538)

IN RE LIZY KURIAN JOHN

2010-1222

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark OfÏce.

ON MOTION

Before RADER, FRIEDMAN, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

ORDER

The Director of the United States Patent and Trademark OfÏce moves to dismiss Lizy Kurian John’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction. John responds. The Director replies.

John filed this appeal seeking review of a non-final decision by the Director of the Patent and Trademark OfÏce denying John's petition requesting that the Director vacate or dismiss a reexamination order. Proceedings2 IN RE JOHN 2 are ongoing at the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences,

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

The Director argues that this court lacks jurisdiction to review an appeal of a decision by the Director on a petition such as this. We agree. See In re Makari, 708 F.2d 709 (Fed. Cir. 1983) (mo jurisdiction to review the decision of the Commissioner on a petition), Further, John has not demonstrated that this case should be transferred. John may seek review from a final Board decision.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

For THE COURT MAY 1 9 2010 /si Jan Horbal

y Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk

ce: Michael F. Campillo, Esq.

Raymond T. Chen, Esq.

s20 Issued as a mandate: MAY 19 2010

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re John, No. 10-1222 (Fed. Cir. May 19, 2010).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1222-20100519
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1222-20100519

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.