Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Biopolymer Engineering, Inc. V.Immunocorp, No. 10-1096 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 22, 2011)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1096
Decided
February 22, 2011
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

BIOPOLYMER ENGINEERING, INC.

(doing business as Biothera),

Plaintiff-Appellant,

and

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,

Plaintiff,

v.

IMMUNOCORP and BIOTECH PHARMACON ASA,

Defendants.

2010-1096

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota in Case No. 05-CV-0536, Judge Joan M. Ericksen.

JUDGMENT

DARREN B. SCHWIEBERT, Fredrikson & Bryson, P.A. , of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was GRANT D. FAIRBAIRN. Of counsel was LORA M. FRIEDEMANN.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 22, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Biopolymer Engineering, Inc. V.Immunocorp, No. 10-1096 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 22, 2011).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1096-20110222
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1096-20110222

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.