Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Biopolymer Engineering, Inc. v. Immunocorp, No. 10-1096 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 21, 2010)

Vacated & Remanded
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1096
Decided
October 21, 2010
Judge
Rader, C.J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

Note: This order is nonprecedential. Gnited States Court of Appeals

for the federal Circuit

BIOPOLYMER ENGINEERING, INC, (DOING

BUSINESS AS BIOTHERA),

Plaintiff-Appellant,

AND

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,

Plaintiff,

Vv.

IMMUNOCORP AnD BIOTEC PHARMACON ASA,

Defendants.

2010-1096

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota in case no. 05-CV-0536, Judge Joan M. Ericksen.

Before RADER, Chief Judge, BRYSON and MOORE, Circuit

Judges.

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

ORDER

Biopolymer Engineering, Inc. (Biothera) submits a combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en2 BIOPOLYMER v. IMMUNOCORP 2

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

banc with respect to the court’s August 2, 2010 order dismissing its appeal as moot.“

The court dismissed the appeal as moot because it appeared that a settlement agreement resolved all claims between the parties. Biothera asserts that the settlement agreement does not resolve claims with respect to all of the products that it accused of infringing United States Patent No. 5,702,719 and thus the appeal is not moot. The court agrees that under these circumstances the appeal is not moot.

Accordingly, Iv Is ORDERED THAT: (1) The petition for panel rehearing is granted. The court’s August 2, 2010 order dismissing this case is vacated and the case is reinstated.

(2) Biothera’s brief is due within 30 days of the date of filing of this order.

For THE CouRT OCT 2 1 2010 /s/ Jan Horbal

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk

ce: Darren B. Schwiebert, Esq.

Susan A. Cahoon, Esq. US. court Ue EALS FOR

THE FE L CIRCUIT

817

OCT 2 1 2010

JAN HORBALY

CLERK

  • * The court did not request an answer because Biothera is the only party participating in this appeal.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Biopolymer Engineering, Inc. v. Immunocorp, No. 10-1096 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 21, 2010).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1096-20101021
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1096-20101021

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.