Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

I4I v. Microsoft, No. 09-1504 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 10, 2010)

Vacated & Remanded
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 09-1504
Decided
March 10, 2010
Judge
Prost, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1504

I4I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and

INFRASTRUCTURES FOR INFORMATION INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant. Before SCHALL, PROST, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING

A combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc was filed by Microsoft Corporation. A response was invited by the panel and filed by i4i Limited Partnership. That was followed by Microsoft’s Motion for Leave to File a Reply in Support of Combined Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc. Among the issues on which Microsoft has sought rehearing is the holding that Microsoft did not challenge the district court’s denial of Microsoft’s post-verdict JMOL on willfulness. i4i Ltd. v. Microsoft Corp., 589 F.3d 1246, 1273 (Fed. Cir. 2009). Microsoft argues that this conclusion is factually incorrect, that review of the jury’s willfulness verdict is required, and that it should prevail on that question.

2IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Microsoft’s Motion for Leave to File a Reply in Support of Combined Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc is granted. (2) Microsoft’s Petition for Panel Rehearing is granted for the limited purpose of revising portions of the discussion of willfulness. (3) The previous opinion in this appeal issued December 22, 2009 and reported at i4i Ltd. v. Microsoft Corp., 589 F.3d 1246 (Fed. Cir. 2009), is withdrawn and replaced with the revised opinion accompanying this order. The Petition for Rehearing En Banc will be circulated to the full court along with a copy of this order. FOR THE COURT

March 10, 2010 ___ /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

cc: Matthew D. Powers Donald R. Dunner John W. Thornburgh Richard Samp

2009-1504 2

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

I4I v. Microsoft, No. 09-1504 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 10, 2010).

Record ID
CAFC-09-1504-20100310
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-09-1504-20100310

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.