Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Smith v. CHF Industries, Inc., No. 08-1320 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 6, 2009)

Vacated & Remanded
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 08-1320
Decided
February 6, 2009
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1320

PARK B. SMITH, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

CHF INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee. Richard A. DePalma, Thompson Hine, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Katheryn M. Ryan, Baker & McKenzie LLP, of New York, New York. Stephen L. Sulzer, Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was James P. Calve. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Senior Judge Lawrence M. McKenna

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1320

PARK B. SMITH, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

CHF INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in case no. 06-CV-0869, Senior Judge Lawrence M. McKenna.

DECIDED: February 6, 2009

Before MAYER, SCHALL, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

The district court’s grant of summary judgment of non-infringement to CHF Industries, Inc. was based upon the point of novelty test, which was eliminated by Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc., 543 F.3d 665 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (en banc). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is vacated and the case is remanded for reconsideration and further proceedings as appropriate in light of Egyptian Goddess.

COSTS

Each side shall bear its own costs.

VACATED AND REMANDED

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Smith v. CHF Industries, Inc., No. 08-1320 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 6, 2009).

Record ID
CAFC-08-1320-20090206
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-08-1320-20090206

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.