Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Monster Cable Products, Inc. v. the Quest Group (Doing Business as Audioquest), No. 06-1111 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 13, 2006)

Affirmed
Infringement Claim Construction Doctrine of Equivalents
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 06-1111
Decided
December 13, 2006
Judge
Moore, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

06-1111,-1112

MONSTER CABLE PRODUCTS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

THE QUEST GROUP

(doing business as Audioquest),

Defendant-Cross Appellant. DECIDED: December 13, 2006

Before GAJARSA, Circuit Judge, PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and MOORE, Circuit Judge.

PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge.

On the basis of District Judge Patel’s thorough claim construction, Monster Cable Prods., Inc., v. The Quest Group, No. 04-0005 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2005), and her comprehensive analysis of the infringement issues, both literal and under the doctrine of equivalents, Monster Cable Prods., Inc., v. The Quest Group, No. 04-0005, 2005 WL 1875466 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2005), and after considering the parties’ briefs and arguments, we affirm the appealed judgment of the district court in all respects. In addition, we affirm the district court’s rulings on the issues raised in the cross-appeal.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Monster Cable Products, Inc. v. the Quest Group (Doing Business as Audioquest), No. 06-1111 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 13, 2006).

Record ID
CAFC-06-1111-20061213
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-06-1111-20061213

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error