Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest

Enablement

Enablement requires that a patent's specification teach a person skilled in the art how to make and use the full scope of the claimed invention without undue experimentation. The question is one of law resting on factual findings, and courts weigh factors including the quantity of experimentation needed, the amount of guidance in the specification, the predictability of the field, and the breadth of the claims. The requirement is most demanding where claims are broad and the technology unpredictable, and the Supreme Court's decision in Amgen v. Sanofi reaffirmed that the full claimed scope must be enabled. The opinions collected here address enablement as a validity defence.

31 opinions and orders.