Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Computer acceleration Corporation v. International Business Machines Corp., No. 9:07-cv-00245 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 11, 2007)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division
Case No.
No. 9:07-cv-00245, Dkt. No. 15
Decided
December 11, 2007
Judge
Ron Clark, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting 13 Motion to Dismiss. The Court hereby dismisses the claims of Computer Acceleration Corporation against International Business Machines Corp. made in the above-referenced and numbered case. This dismissal is with prejudice
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUFKIN DIVISION

COMPUTER ACCELERATION §

CORPORATION, §

§ Plaintiff, § CIVIL ACTION 9:07-CV-00245-RHC § vs. § § INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS § JURY TRIAL

MACHINES CORP. §

§ Defendant. §

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

The Court considered Computer Acceleration Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss its Claims Against International Business Machines Corp. With Prejudice. After considering the Motion, the Court hereby dismisses the claims of Computer Acceleration Corporation against International Business Machines Corp. made in the above-referenced and numbered case. This dismissal is with prejudice.

Austin 40741v1

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Computer acceleration Corporation v. International Business Machines Corp., No. 9:07-cv-00245 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 11, 2007).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-9_07-cv-00245-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-9_07-cv-00245-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.