Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Scanner Technologies, Corp. v. Nvidia Corporation, No. 9:06-cv-00205 (E.D. Tex. July 26, 2007)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division
Case No.
No. 9:06-cv-00205, Dkt. No. 95
Decided
July 26, 2007
Judge
Ron Clark, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING 93 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as the findings and conclusions of law are incorporated in support of this order. The Court finally ORDERS that this civil action is DISMISSED, in its entirety without prejudice to refile. The Cl…
Length
2 pages

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUFKIN DIVISION

SCANNER TECHNOLOGIES CORP., §

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § CIVIL ACTION No. 9:06cv205

§

NVIDIA CORP., §

Defendant. §

ORDER ADOPTING AND OF DISMISSAL

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and the Local Rules for the United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Appendix B, the Court referred this matter to United States Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin for consideration and recommended disposition of case-dispositive pretrial matters.

Judge Giblin previously conducted a telephonic conference to hear arguments about the appropriate disposition of this case in light of a final judgment entered by United States District Judge Denny Chin in a related proceeding in the Southern District of New York, Case No. 00-CV-04992, Scanner Tech Corp. v. ICOS Vision Systems Corp. N.V. On July 10, 2007, Judge Giblin issued a Report and Recommendation (#93) based upon that judgment and the telephonic hearing. Judge Giblin recommended that the Court grant Defendant, NVIDIA Corp.’s oral motion to dismiss this proceeding without prejudice. To date, the parties have not filed objections to that recommendation in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).

Accordingly, having reviewed the record and Judge Giblin’s report, the Court agrees with2 the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommended disposition. The Court ORDERS that the Report and Recommendation on Dismissal (#93) is ADOPTED. Judge Giblin’s findings and conclusions of law are incorporated in support of this order.

The Court finally ORDERS that this civil action is DISMISSED, in its entirety, without prejudice to refile. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Scanner Technologies, Corp. v. Nvidia Corporation, No. 9:06-cv-00205 (E.D. Tex. July 26, 2007).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-9_06-cv-00205-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-9_06-cv-00205-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.