IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
SMARTFLASH LLC, et al., § § Plaintiffs, § CASE NO. 6:13cv447-JRG-KNM § v. § § JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
APPLE INC., et al., § § Defendants. § § SMARTFLASH LLC, et al., § § Plaintiffs, § CASE NO. 6:13cv448-JRG-KNM v. § § JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. § et al., § § Defendants. § §
ORDER
Before the Court are Apple’s and Defendants’ Motions for Partial Summary Judgment of Non-infringement (6:13CV447, Doc. Nos. 271 & 272; 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 322) and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (6:13CV447, Doc. No. 390; 6:13CV448; Doc. No. 436) recommending that the Motions be denied. Having considered Defendants’ Objections to the Report and Recommendation Regarding Apple’s and Defendants’ Motions for Partial Summary Judgment of Non-infringement (6:13CV447, Doc. No. 415, 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 480), and having conducted a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation as to which objection was made, and finding no error therein, the Court does hereby adopt the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly,
2IT IS ORDERED that Apple’s and Defendants’ Motions for Partial Summary Judgment of Non-infringement (6:13CV447, Doc. Nos. 271 & 272; 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 322) are DENIED.