Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

MacroSolve, Inc. v. LinkedIn Corporation, No. 6:12-cv-00385 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 27, 2013)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:12-cv-00385, Dkt. No. 59
Decided
February 27, 2013
Judge
Michael H. Schneider, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 54 Report and Recommendations. The motions to dismiss, Doc. Nos. 12 and 22, are hereby DENIED
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

MACROSOLVE, INC.

§ §

Plaintiff,

§ §

vs.

§ No. 6:12cv385 MHS-JDL §

LINKEDIN CORPORATION

§ JURY DEMANDED

§

Defendant.

§ §

ORDER

The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (“Report”), which contains his proposed findings of fact and recommendation for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration (Doc. No. 54). The Magistrate Judge recommends denying LinkedIn’s Motions to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim (Doc. Nos. 12, 22). The parties have made no objections to the Report and Recommendations. The Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court. Accordingly, the motions to dismiss (Doc. Nos. 12, 22) are hereby DENIED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

MacroSolve, Inc. v. LinkedIn Corporation, No. 6:12-cv-00385 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 27, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-6_12-cv-00385-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-6_12-cv-00385-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.