Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Weekly DigestIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03256-DME-KMT PLX TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v. FRANCIS P. KNUETTEL, II,
Defendant.
The Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Response to Defendant’s Motion to Transfer Venue [Doc. No. 17] is GRANTED. DATED: March 8, 2012
Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.
Analysis is coming soon.
A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.
PLX Technology, Inc. v. Knuettel, No. 6:12-cv-00383 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 7, 2012).
No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error