Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. v. OEA International, Inc. et al, No. 6:11-cv-00532 (E.D. Tex. July 15, 2011)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
General / Procedural
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00532, Dkt. No. 29
Decided
July 15, 2011
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER CONTINUING MOTION HEARING as to 21 Motion to Sever, Motion to Transfer Case. Motion Hearing set for 9/20/2011 01:00 PM before Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 OAKLAND DIVISION

9

10 CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC., Case No: C 11-713 SBA 11 Plaintiff, ORDER CONTINUING MOTION HEARING

12 vs. Docket 21

13 OEA INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 The hearing on Defendants’ motion to sever and to transfer, Dkt. 21, scheduled for 17 July 26, 2011 is CONTINUED to September 20, 2011 at 1:00 p.m. Pursuant to Federal 18 Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court, in its discretion, may 19 resolve the motion without oral argument. The parties are advised to check the Court’s 20 website to determine whether a court appearance is required. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED.

22 Dated: July 15, 2011 _______________________________

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG

23

United States District Judge 24 25 26 27

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. v. OEA International, Inc. et al, No. 6:11-cv-00532 (E.D. Tex. July 15, 2011).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-6_11-cv-00532-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-6_11-cv-00532-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case