Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Texas Instruments Incorporated et al, No. 6:11-cv-00491 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 31, 2013)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00491, Dkt. No. 175
Decided
October 31, 2013
Judge
Michael H. Schneider, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING 147 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Length
2 pages

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

U.S. ETHERNET INNOVATIONS, LLC., Plaintiff, v. RICOH AMERICAS CORPORATION Defendant.§ § § § § CASE NO. 6:12-CV-235-MHS-JDL § § JURY TRIAL DEMANDED § § §
U.S. ETHERNET INNOVATIONS, LLC., Plaintiff, v. TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED, Defendant.§ § § § § CASE NO. 6:11-CV-491-MHS-JDL § § JURY TRIAL DEMANDED § § §

The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (6:12-cv-235, Doc. No. 284; 6:11-cv-491, Doc. No. 147) has been presented for consideration. The Magistrate Judge recommends denying Defendants’1 Motion for Summary2 Judgment that the Asserted Claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,299,313 and 5,307,459 are Invalid for Indefiniteness Under 35 U.S.C. § 112(2) (6:12-cv-235, Doc. No. 169). No objections have been . filed. Having carefully considered the Parties’ arguments, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings of this Court.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment be DENIED.

It is SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 31st day of October, 2013.

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Footnotes

  1. 1 Defendants are: Texas Instruments Incorporated (6:11-cv-491), Ricoh Americas Corporation, Xerox Corporation, Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Epson America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung TeleCommunications America, LLC, and Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC, Oki Data Americas Inc., and STMicroelectronics N.V. and STMicroelectronics, Inc.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Texas Instruments Incorporated et al, No. 6:11-cv-00491 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 31, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-6_11-cv-00491-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-6_11-cv-00491-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.