Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC v. Landis+Gyr Inc. et al, No. 6:11-cv-00317 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 9, 2013)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00317, Dkt. No. 448
Decided
September 9, 2013
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 366 Report and Recommendations and denying Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Indefiniteness 340
Length
2 pages

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

EON CORP. IP HOLDINGS, LLC, §

Plaintiff, §

§ §

v. § Civil Action No. 6:11-cv-317-LED-JDL

§ § JURY TRIAL REQUESTED LANDIS+GYR INC., et al., § Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge has been presented for consideration (Doc. No. 366). The Magistrate Judge recommends denying Defendants’1 Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Indefiniteness (Doc. No. 340). No objections have been filed. Having carefully considered the parties’ arguments, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings of this Court.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment be DENIED.

2So ORDERED and SIGNED this 9th day of September, 2013.

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

LEONARD DAVIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Footnotes

  1. 1 The only remaining moving Defendant is Silver Spring Networks, Inc. Originally, the moving Defendants were Elster Solutions, LLC, EnergyICT, Inc., Elster Amco Water, LLC, Itron, Inc., Landis+Gyr Inc., Silver Spring Networks, Inc., and Trilliant Networks, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”).

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC v. Landis+Gyr Inc. et al, No. 6:11-cv-00317 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 9, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-6_11-cv-00317-3
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-6_11-cv-00317-3

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.